杏吧Pro

Connecticut lawmakers last week moved swiftly to plug what could have been a very costly loophole in workers’ compensation benefits that was created by a state in March.

The lawmakers effectively invalidated the high court ruling that altered how temporary partial disability benefits are awarded. Insurance industry analysts warned that the change initiated by the court could have increased workers’ compensation system claim costs by as much as 265% for public and private employers.

In March, the Connecticut Supreme Court overturned legal precedent in Gardner v. Dept. of Mental Health & Addiction Services. The ruling held that workers’ compensation administrative law judges have discretion to grant temporary partial disability benefits for up to 520 weeks rather than requiring them to be converted to permanent partial disability benefits after maximum medical improvement.

Lawmakers responded by inserting a provision in a supplementary budget measure. The provision removes an administrative law judge’s discretion to award temporary partial incapacity benefits and eliminates the anticipated cost increases associated with the ruling that would have affected both the state and various self-insured municipalities.

The legislative fix was promptly approved by the Judiciary Committee and inserted into the budget measure (HB 6863) that addressed state budget overruns.

According to a legislative assessment, the savings to the state alone could exceed $4 million per year and may vary significantly from year-to year based on the number of cases and the determinations of the administrative law judges.

Rep. Jack Fazzino, D-Meriden, vice chair of the Judiciary Committee, called the effect Gardner could have on the state and municipalities “really very radical.”

Eric George, president of the Insurance Association of Connecticut, told the that municipalities, insurers, businesses, trial lawyers and labor quickly came to an agreement that something had to be done. “That does not happen often,” George told the publication.

The Gardner ruling reversed both a 2024 judgment of the state appellate court and an earlier workers compensation board ruling that favored the injured worker’s employer, the state Department of Mental Health, which argued administrative law judges had no such discretion. The Supreme Court justices found that the “clear and unambiguous language” of the law (搂 31-308) provides that the administrative law judge “may” but is not required to award permanent partial disability benefits to a claimant after he or she reaches maximum medical improvement.

The court also found that, contrary to the employer’s argument, legislative amendments to the workers compensation law enacted in 1993 did not change the text or meaning of the statute relating to the administrative law judge’s discretion. Neither did the court accept that the legislative history of those amendments altered the situation.

The Workers’ Compensation Commission has15 administrative law judges who preside over dispute resolution hearings in its eight district offices.

Topics Legislation Workers' Compensation Connecticut